- #Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 full#
- #Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 portable#
- #Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 software#
- #Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 windows#
You can't scroll the raws you need to convert individual files. Then when you press the A key it opens the raw file rather than the jpg at 100%.ĭoes that slow it down when scrolling the raws? You can do a default conversion of raw files. It also does a different conversion than was done by the camera so don't be surprised if the resulting JPG looks different from the out of camera JPG even if you don't tell Batch Convert to make any changes. The Batch Convert tool does let you change the image size and even appearance so it is a useful tool for use with RAW images. As far as I can tell the only thing FastStone can actually do to a RAW file is to use the Batch Convert Tool to convert it into a JPG. I have tried various things, including reading the manual.
#Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 windows#
Both programs use thumbnails to display photos and ALT text windows to show detailed information about each picture. If you select a RAW file and edit it you are actually editing the embedded JPG. Whilst XnView looks very much like Windows Explorer, with a tree-like structure on the left and the selected folder’s contents on the right, FastStone Image Viewer uses a neatly designed interface that you can customize with skins. I would like to know how you are editing the RAW file in FastStone. Obviously it's a personal choice - who knows, I may even try a different workflow just 'cos it's a new year. My preference is for FS as a 'Swiss Army Knife' tool. As I use a rather old laptop the concept of colour managed display is way beyond my reach.
#Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 full#
If I was using a different tool full time for image editing then I think it would be good for first view/culling etc. The basic drop/draw/rotate tools all work well. I like the additional exif display but find some parts of the file/user operations a but clumsy.
#Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 portable#
tgz (that's zipped standalone portable version if you're a windows user) WRT XnViewMP, as a linux user I appreciate the cross-platform nature and either a package file or fully working. However as a linux user it does have the overhead of needing to run under Wine - which it does almost impeccably apart from a glitch in the thumbnail view which requires the installation of a venerable dll from 2001 - which itself limits one to using Wine 2.1 - nothing newer.įaststone has a number of user customisations for mouse and keyboard which I find very useful as they do speed up long view/culling sessions. The batch resize tool has been handy for customising my icon theme and you can even use FS as a poor man's Powerpoint with the draw tool and slideshow creator. I curate photos for our local U3A photo groups and find the multiple search and replace features in the file renaming tool a real bonus. You do need to adjust the RAW settings to get past working on the embedded jpeg - but TBH I have only used that very occasionally. I am a long time user of FastStone and find that for both RAW and JPEG editing it provides 99.9% of all my needs. The new version is the first release since the release of FastStone Image Viewer 7.5 in March 2020.
#Faststone image editor vs xnview mp image editor 2017 software#
How do Faststone and XnViewMP compare from a feature and performance standpoint? Martin Brinkmann Windows software 26 Listen to article FastStone Image Viewer 7.6 is the latest version of the free (for home use) image viewer for Microsoft Windows devices. I often hear that XnViewMP would be a better match for my needs. The best XnView alternatives are IrfanView, XnView MP and FastStone Image Viewer. Works well for me, except that while it is "color aware", it is not "color managed". Very low priority, I think.I've been a long time Faststone user - mostly for quick viewing and image culling - less so for editing.
The XnView MP developer has been saying on his forum for months that he will make an Apple Silicon version, but nothing yet.
Not nearly as fast, instantaneous, as Faststone on Windows. There is still no Apple Silicon version and I have found that it is glitchy using Rosetta 2 and also slow to go through photos.
XnView MP is okay, but clunky compared to Faststone. I have never found anything nearly as good for Macs. The program is very fast and rather small. Occasionally after getting a photo into Lightroom and looking at the raw I will delete it, but that is rare. and delete those before importing the rest into Lightroom Classic. I am just checking for things like composition, total goofs, etc. Viewer alternatives are IrfanView, XnView MP and FastStone Image Viewer. I have mine set to just show the embedded JPEGs in the raw file because that is fastest. Freeware (Last Update: ) : An image browser, converter and editor that supports. You can do side-by-side views too and I use that all the time to compare similar photos. I have been using Faststone for years and on Windows it is the best I have found.
0 kommentar(er)
